That’s all, your communication proposal is accepted and you will be able to write articles! This is an important step in your journey: You must get used to broadcast your results. So how are you going to do it now? The first reflex is often to know what form the article must have; which rubric should be, because of course you don’t want to default.
But beware, the quality of your article will not only respect the “standard” of writing, but it is even more relevant to the results you express and the pleasure we will take to read you. How do you achieve useful article writing for other people and be fun? That depends on the situation you are facing. If you are faced with a situation where you are required to finish quickly while you do not have enough time, then online writing services such as https://assignment.essayshark.com/ will be very helpful.
Which format will be adopted?
If you do a little touring on the internet before arriving here, you might have noticed that we usually recommend respecting certain plans with well-defined sections in scientific articles.
It is usually said that an article must contain:
– Introduction that outlines the problem, explains why it is interesting / innovative, and announces the article plan.
– Part of the theoretical context (or state of the art) where you stand in relation to the mainstream of analysis of the exact question you are handling. Here you summarize the latest advances in knowledge in your field and show the concepts of what you rely on. And all in a few paragraphs!
– Methodology: this is the part where you explain what your data is and how you collect it.
– The results that you get: Discussions about these results regarding mobilized concepts: finally, what should you say about the phenomenon being studied?
However, this list is not a cooking recipe: this is not mandatory or complete.
Not complete, because some journals are even more specific about the architecture of their articles and claim other points (“ethical considerations”, “goals” etc.).
And it is not mandatory because other publishing committees, on the other hand, do not force their contributors to follow such a pattern. This is especially true in a number of scientific disciplines with a more “literary” tradition, in which journals publish articles with plans that describe arguments in thematic ways and where the presentation of methods and context is reduced, usually called an intro.
So how do you find it and avoid missteps?
Well, you have to go and see for yourself what is expected of you! A review received your contribution? Look for previous review issues and do your investigation. Look at some articles. How are they built? All the same? So do the same thing. Or are they all different? You will then have the freedom to leave more room for discussion of results, for example.
Choose the right topic for your article
An article is between 10 and 15 pages, most of the time; this makes you a little space to develop logical arguments, while presenting data that is the basis. To write a good article is to first find a subject that has the right dimensions. How to do it?
First of all, you should not regard articles as excerpts from your thesis (except in the case of theses with articles, as can sometimes be done in economics for example). It’s hard to extract a small piece of long argument; this can produce the impression of incompleteness, the feeling that one does not have all the elements to draw conclusions.
The article cannot be a summary of all of your dissertations or most of them. If you try to say your whole thesis, you will fly and fall into generalization.
You will choose a specific theme, present in your thesis (centered or periphery) and attached to the call for contribution if necessary. Indeed, often journals launch calls for contributions to impose themes; sometimes it can take you away from your thesis, take you to another point of view, but only that is useful. Hopefully the above approaches can help you to have better abilities.