For every budding Illustrator, the process of choosing the right software products for creating digital art can be frustrating. There are tons of great software out there, including Adobe Lightroom, Photoshop, Illustrator, and Fresco.
If you are caught in a dilemma while choosing between Adobe Lightroom and Adobe Photoshop, a detailed comparison between the two available applications can provide you the perfect opportunity to explore before making your choice. However, if you are stuck between Illustrator and Fresco, you have come to the right place because the article below focuses on comparing the Illustrator software products, Adobe Illustrator and Adobe Fresco.
The major point of distinction between Adobe Illustrator and Adobe Fresco is that Fresco is a drawing and painting software that allows you to draw with both vectors and pixels. At the same time, Illustrator gives you a broader space to create logos, graphics, and illustrations. However, there are very few other softwares that offer a greater variety of functionality in the field of digital art, some differences between the two need to be addressed.
Adobe Fresco offers a time-lapse feature that allows the artists to record their drawings in videos that can be easily portrayed as perfect online content, especially in the art forums. Adobe Illustrator has not introduced this feature yet.
Fresco offers UI customization for artists that facilitates left and/or right-handed drawing and full-screen mode to avoid unnecessary distractions, while Illustrator provides some significant additions like color synchronization, perspective drawing enhancements, CSS extractor tool, etc., along with the features mentioned above.
Illustrator allows you to automatically extract colors and trace hand-drawn sketches, allowing you to add them to the design or create a vector graphic with Adobe Sensei AI. However, Fresco is due to launch this feature yet.
Pixel Perfect Designs
Adobe Illustrator gives artists a vast space to work in a professional capacity. From creating graphic designs, logos, video games to simple designs, sketches, illustrations, the software produces precise artworks with pixel-perfect brilliance. In contrast, Fresco needs to improve its existing tools for greater precision.
Though Adobe Fresco has a wide range of live brushes that would leave beginners in awe, it needs serious improvement as any experienced artist may find it pretty underbaked compared to the instruments provided by Adobe Illustrator.
The appearance panel of Adobe Illustrator gives you easy access to work with complex operations like adjusting effects, creating multiple strokes. In contrast, in Adobe Fresco, you might find a lack of depth and options to work with.
Illustrator has a vivid stock of tools that one needs in a professional drawing software/application. It also allows script customization along with the built-in ones that leave huge room for Fresco for improvement.
Illustrator has integrated InDesign’s OpenType Glyph chooser pop-down to provide the typographers a plethora of styles to choose from for typing. On the contrary, Fresco again needs major improvement to meet Illustrator’s extraordinary features.
Fresco does not allow any alternatives to the default canvas texture available, whereas Illustrator has various options at your disposal.
Finding the best Illustrator to create or enhance your artwork can be a daunting task for all creative heads out there. While seasoned artists may find Adobe Illustrator better suited for their professional needs, Adobe Fresco is a better fit for newcomers to the digital art world, owing to its simple interface and easy usage.
While Illustrator is available on several Mac and Windows OS devices, Fresco is available on iPhone, iPad, and Microsoft Surface Pro devices. Adobe Illustrator comes with a pocket pinch of $19.99 per month with an annual commitment or $29.99 on a month-to-month basis.
It is only available via subscription. On the other hand, Fresco is free for Adobe Creative Cloud Subscribers and $9.99 worth of expense on Windows for non-subscribers. Both incredibly efficient in their rights and capacity, the two applications are undoubtedly the best options for their respective target audience.